Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies > Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1989

Longitudinal Wave

General Information

Title
Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1989
Abstract

Two wave survey on voters' opinions: before and after the Dutch parliamentary elections of 1989. Systematic analysis of change in political opinions and behaviour of the Dutch electorate.

Pre-election wave: reading of newspapers / tv newscast exposure / most important national problems / party identification and membership / evaluation of government policy on economic situation, labour market, personal income situation / political issues ( perception of main parties standpoint, own stand ): abortion, nuclear plants, differences in income / voting in last European Parliament elections / voting in last national election / coalition preference / opinion on cleaning pollution / sympathy rating of parties and leading politicians / party identification of parents /

Post-election wave, additional variables: voting behaviour / time of vote decision / voting stability / political issues ( perception of main parties stand, own stand ): euthanasia, NATO nuclear arms on Dutch territory / expectations regarding own income situation, general prosperity and influence of coalition on that / prevalence of reduction of unemployment versus reduction of government debts / knowledge of, opinions on leading politicians / left, right rating of political parties / sense of political efficacy / civic competence, participation / party campaign activities / membership of and participation in extra-parliamentary organizations / influence of religion / pillarization - compartmentalization / confessionalism / secularism / self centredness / importance of national political goals /sympathy rating of politicians Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ housing situation/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ social class/ politics/ religion/ readership, mass media, and 'cultural' exposure/ organizational membership.

Longitudinal Type
Longitudinal Wave
Begin date
25-07-1989
End date
13-11-1989
Note

Cite as: J.J.A Thomassen (University of Twente); B. Niemöller (University of Amsterdam); J.W. van Deth (University of Twente); C. van der Eijk (University of Amsterdam); G.A. Irwin (University of Leiden); Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland (SKON) (1989): Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek, NKO 1989. DANS. http://dx.doi.org/10.17026/dans-xzm-bskq

Persistent Identifier: http://www.persistent-identifier.nl/?identifier=urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-0qd-w7h

Researcher
J.J.A Thomassen (University of Twente); B. Niemöller (University of Amsterdam); J.W. van Deth (University of Twente); C. van der Eijk (University of Amsterdam); G.A. Irwin (University of Leiden); Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland (SKON)
Publisher
SKON / DANS / CentERdata
Copyright
SKON
Funding Organization
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (SCP)
University of Amsterdam
University of Nijmegen
Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen (OCW)
Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties - BZK
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoe

Datasets and documentation

View Documentation


Data Files

Variables

Variable name Variable Label Variable Type
var001Study numberdirectly measured
var002Respondent identification numberdirectly measured
var003Type of interview recorddirectly measured
var004Reads about national news?directly measured
var005Talks about national problems?directly measured
var006Reads about foreign news?directly measured
var007Interested in politics?directly measured
var008Political interest scoredirectly measured
var009Frequency watching tv newscastdirectly measured
var010Daily newspaper - 1st answerdirectly measured
var011Daily newspaper - 2nd answerdirectly measured
var012Daily newspaper - 3rd answerdirectly measured
var013Daily newspaper - 4th answerdirectly measured
var014Most important national problem-1st answerdirectly measured
var015Most important national problem - 2nd answerdirectly measured
var016Most important national problem - 3rd answerdirectly measured
var017Most important national problem - 4th answerdirectly measured
var018Most important national problem - 5th answerdirectly measured
var019Intends to vote in 1989 parl elections?directly measured
var020Vote intention 1989 parl electionsdirectly measured
var021Vote intention if obliged to votedirectly measured
var022Resp is (not) an adherent to a partydirectly measured
var023Party respondent is an adherent todirectly measured
var024Resp is (not) convinced adherentdirectly measured
var025Resp is not an adherent but attracted todirectly measured
var026Party resp is attracted todirectly measured
var027Strength of adherencedirectly measured
var028Direction of adherencedirectly measured
var029Resp is (not) a member of a partydirectly measured
var030Party respondent is a member ofdirectly measured
var031Has resp ever been a member of a party?directly measured
var032Satisfaction with governmentdirectly measured
var033Effect govt policy on economic situationdirectly measured
var034Effect govt policy on employmentdirectly measured
var035Policy satisfaction scoredirectly measured
var036Effect govt policy on resp's financesdirectly measured
var037Abortion - perception of CDAdirectly measured
var038Abortion - perception of PvdAdirectly measured
var039Abortion - perception of VVDdirectly measured
var040Abortion - perception of D66directly measured
var041Abortion - respondent's preferencedirectly measured
var042Nuclear plants - perception of CDAdirectly measured
var043Nuclear plants - perception of PvdAdirectly measured
var044Nuclear plants - perception of VVDdirectly measured
var045Nuclear plants - perception of D66directly measured
var046Nuclear plants - resp's preferencedirectly measured
var047Closing nuclear plants - yes or no?directly measured
var048Income differences - perception of CDAdirectly measured
var049Income differences - perception of PvdAdirectly measured
var050Income differences - perception of VVDdirectly measured
var051Income differences - perception of D66directly measured
var052Income differences - resp's preferencedirectly measured
var053Did (not) vote in 1989 European electnsdirectly measured
var054Party voted for in 1989 European electnsdirectly measured
var055Did (not) vote in 1986 parl electionsdirectly measured
var056Party voted for in 1986 parl electionsdirectly measured
var057D66 preferred in cabinet?directly measured
var058PvdA preferred in cabinet?directly measured
var059CDA preferred in cabinet?directly measured
var060VVD preferred in cabinet?directly measured
var061Preferred government coalitiondirectly measured
var062Does it matter who are in the coalition?directly measured
var063Commuting expenses no longer deductibledirectly measured
var064Should car owners pay for pollution?directly measured
var065Should agriculture pay for pollution?directly measured
var066Should industry pay for pollution?directly measured
var067CDA and VVD-cooperation in past govtdirectly measured
var068CDA and PvdA-cooperation in future govtdirectly measured
var069PvdA and VVD-cooperation in future govtdirectly measured
var070CDA and VVD-cooperation in future govtdirectly measured
var071Cooperation of politicians within PvdAdirectly measured
var072Cooperation of politicians within VVDdirectly measured
var073Cooperation of politicians within CDAdirectly measured
var074Cooperation of politicians within D66directly measured
var075Evaluation of Kok as floor leaderdirectly measured
var076Evaluation of De Vries as floor leaderdirectly measured
var077Evaluation of Voorhoeve as floor leaderdirectly measured
var078Evaluation of Van Mierlo as floor leaderdirectly measured
var079Evaluation of Lubbers as prime ministerdirectly measured
var080Evaluation of Korthals Altes as ministerdirectly measured
var081Evaluation of Deetman as ministerdirectly measured
var082Evaluation of Nijpels as ministerdirectly measured
var083Evaluation of Ruding as ministerdirectly measured
var084Evaluation of De Korte as ministerdirectly measured
var085Evaluation of Smit-Kroes as ministerdirectly measured
var086Left-right selfrating (7 point scale)directly measured
var087Discussed politics at home when adolescdirectly measured
var088Recalls party preference of father?directly measured
var089Party pref of father during adolescencedirectly measured
var090Recalls party preference of mother?directly measured
var091Party pref of mother during adolescencedirectly measured
var092Age of respondentdirectly measured
var093Sex of respondentdirectly measured
var094Education of respondentdirectly measured
var095Marital statusdirectly measured
var096Employment status of respondentdirectly measured
var097EGP current occupation of respondentdirectly measured
var098EGP former occupation of respondentdirectly measured
var099Typology of household compositiondirectly measured
var100Respondent is (not) head of householddirectly measured
var101Education of head of householddirectly measured
var102EGP curent occupation of h of hhdirectly measured
var103EGP former occupation of head of householddirectly measured
var104Respondent has (not) a partnerdirectly measured
var105Degree of urbanizationdirectly measured
var106Regiondirectly measured
var107Is respondent religious?directly measured
var108Religious denomination of respondentdirectly measured
var109Other religious denomination of respdirectly measured
var110Dutch reformed denomination of respdirectly measured
var111Calvinist denomination of respondentdirectly measured
var112Resp's attendance of religious servicesdirectly measured
var113Denomination under which resp was raiseddirectly measured
var114Other denom under which resp was raiseddirectly measured
var115Religious denomination of partnerdirectly measured
var116Other religious denomination of prtnrdirectly measured
var117Dutch reformed denomination of partnerdirectly measured
var118Calvinist denomination of partnerdirectly measured
var119Partner's attendance of relig servicesdirectly measured
var120Denom under which partner was raiseddirectly measured
var121Other denom under which prtnr was raiseddirectly measured
var122Social class - self imagedirectly measured
var123Income of respondent's householddirectly measured
var124Resp has higher income than partner?directly measured
var125Health insurance - head of householddirectly measured
var126Is respondent or h of hh houseowner?directly measured
var127Does respondent or partner own a car?directly measured
var128Distance between resp's home and workdirectly measured
var129Resp's principal mode of transp to workdirectly measured
var130Distance between h of hh's home and workdirectly measured
var131H of hh's princip mode of transp to workdirectly measured
var132Date of first interview (mmdd)directly measured
var133Start of first interview (hhmmss)directly measured
var134End of first interview (hhmmss)directly measured
var135Duration of first interview (hmmss)directly measured
var136Present at interview - children under 6ydirectly measured
var137Present at interview-childrn 6y and overdirectly measured
var138Present at interview-spouse or partnerdirectly measured
var139Present at interview-other relativesdirectly measured
var140Present at interview-other adultsdirectly measured
var141Presence of disturbing influencesdirectly measured
var142Disturbing influences - 1st codingdirectly measured
var143Disturbing influences - 2nd codingdirectly measured
var144Reads about campaign newsdirectly measured
var145Did (not) watch election debate on tvdirectly measured
var146Did (not) vote in 1989 parl electionsdirectly measured
var147Party voted for in 1989 parl electionsdirectly measured
var148Party choice-1st reasondirectly measured
var149Party choice-2nd reasondirectly measured
var150Party choice-3rd reasondirectly measured
var151Party choice-4th reasondirectly measured
var152Party choice-5th reasondirectly measured
var153Did (not) cast preferential votedirectly measured
var154Did cast preferential vote - 1st reasondirectly measured
var155Did cast preferential vote - 2nd reasondirectly measured
var156Name of candidate respondent voted fordirectly measured
var157Party choice - when decideddirectly measured
var158Previous voting behavior of respondentdirectly measured
var159Parties previously voted for-1st answerdirectly measured
var160Parties previously voted for-2nd answerdirectly measured
var161Parties previously voted for-3rd answerdirectly measured
var162Considered not to vote in 1989directly measured
var163Did (not) hesitate about party choicedirectly measured
var164Party considered as alternative choicedirectly measured
var165Did not vote - reasondirectly measured
var166Did not vote - when decideddirectly measured
var167Preferred party of nonvotersdirectly measured
var168Euthanasia - perception of CDAdirectly measured
var169Euthanasia - perception of PvdAdirectly measured
var170Euthanasia - perception of VVDdirectly measured
var171Euthanasia - perception of D66directly measured
var172Euthanasia - respondent's preferencedirectly measured
var173Nuclear weapons - first itemdirectly measured
var174Nuclear weapons - second itemdirectly measured
var175Nuclear weapons - third itemdirectly measured
var176Nuclear weapons - fourth itemdirectly measured
var177Nuclear weapons - fifth itemdirectly measured
var178Nuclear weapons attitude scoredirectly measured
var179Nuclear weapons - perception of CDAdirectly measured
var180Nuclear weapons - perception of PvdAdirectly measured
var181Nuclear weapons - perception of VVDdirectly measured
var182Nuclear weapons - perception of D66directly measured
var183Reduce deficit or reduce unemployment?directly measured
var184Expected effect CDA-VVD govt r's financdirectly measured
var185Expected effect CDA-PvdA govt r's financdirectly measured
var186Expectation general prosperity in 4 yrsdirectly measured
var187Expected effect CDA-VVD govt genrl prospdirectly measured
var188Expected effct PvdA-CDA govt genrl prospdirectly measured
var189Photo a - Beckersdirectly measured
var190Party of Beckersdirectly measured
var191Political function of Beckersdirectly measured
var192Photo b - Korthals Altesdirectly measured
var193Party of Korthals Altesdirectly measured
var194Political function of Korthals Altesdirectly measured
var195Photo c - Kombrinkdirectly measured
var196Party of Kombrinkdirectly measured
var197Political function of Kombrinkdirectly measured
var198Photo d - De Vriesdirectly measured
var199Party of De Vriesdirectly measured
var200Political function of De Vriesdirectly measured
var201Political knowledge (4 items)directly measured
var202Political knowledge (12 items)directly measured
var203Faith in Lubbers as premierdirectly measured
var204Faith in Kok as premierdirectly measured
var205Faith in Voorhoeve as premierdirectly measured
var206Left-right selfrating (10 point scale)directly measured
var207Left-right rating of PvdAdirectly measured
var208Left-right rating of VVDdirectly measured
var209Left-right rating of D66directly measured
var210Left-right rating of PPRdirectly measured
var211Left-right rating of CPNdirectly measured
var212Left-right rating of CDAdirectly measured
var213Left-right rating of Groen Linksdirectly measured
var214Left-right rating of SGPdirectly measured
var215Left-right rating of PSPdirectly measured
var216Left-right rating of GPVdirectly measured
var217Left-right rating of RPFdirectly measured
var218Left-right rating of CD/Centrumpartijdirectly measured
var219Political efficacy - first itemdirectly measured
var220Political efficacy - second itemdirectly measured
var221Political efficacy - third itemdirectly measured
var222Political efficacy - fourth itemdirectly measured
var223Political efficacy scoredirectly measured
var224Political cynicism - first itemdirectly measured
var225Political cynicism - second itemdirectly measured
var226Political cynicism - third itemdirectly measured
var227Political cynicism scoredirectly measured
var228Chance of acting against unjust billdirectly measured
var229Did (not) contact cabinet ministersdirectly measured
var230Did (not) contact member of parliamentdirectly measured
var231Did (not) sign a petitiondirectly measured
var232Did (not) try to activate interest groupdirectly measured
var233Did (not) try to activate radio or tvdirectly measured
var234Did (not) try to activate political ptydirectly measured
var235Did (not) contact mayor or aldermandirectly measured
var236Did (not) contact municipal councillordirectly measured
var237Did (not) join civic action groupdirectly measured
var238Did (not) join demonstrationdirectly measured
var239Did (not) try to activate newspaperdirectly measured
var240Did (not) lodge a complaintdirectly measured
var241Did (not) contact department officialdirectly measured
var242Civic participation scoredirectly measured
var243Number of campaign activitiesdirectly measured
var244Resp is (not) a member of a uniondirectly measured
var245Union of which respondent is a memberdirectly measured
var246Resp's union affiliated with FNV or CNVdirectly measured
var247Other union member in household?directly measured
var248Resp is (not) a member of profess. org.directly measured
var249Probability of future vote for PvdAdirectly measured
var250Probability of future vote for VVDdirectly measured
var251Probability of future vote for D66directly measured
var252Probability of future vote for PPRdirectly measured
var253Probability of future vote for CPNdirectly measured
var254Probability of future vote for CDAdirectly measured
var255Probability of future vote for Gr Linksdirectly measured
var256Probability of future vote for SGPdirectly measured
var257Probability of future vote for PSPdirectly measured
var258Probability of future vote for GPVdirectly measured
var259Probability of future vote for RPFdirectly measured
var260Probability of future vote for CD/Cpdirectly measured
var261Should there be confessional parties?directly measured
var262Should there be confessional unions?directly measured
var263Should there be confessional schools?directly measured
var264Should there be confess radio or tv?directly measured
var265Religion is a good guide in politicsdirectly measured
var266Confessional attitude scoredirectly measured
var267Value priorities - 1st out of 4 itemsdirectly measured
var268Value priorities - 2nd out of 4 itemsdirectly measured
var269Value priorities - 3rd out of 4 itemsdirectly measured
var270Value priorities - 4th out of 4 itemsdirectly measured
var271Value priorities most import-1st answerdirectly measured
var272Value priorities most import-2nd answerdirectly measured
var273Value priorities most import-3rd answerdirectly measured
var274Value priorities least import-1st answerdirectly measured
var275Value priorities least import-2nd answerdirectly measured
var276Value priorities least import-3rd answerdirectly measured
var277Sympathy score Lubbersdirectly measured
var278Sympathy score Kokdirectly measured
var279Sympathy score Voorhoevedirectly measured
var280Sympathy score Van Mierlodirectly measured
var281Sympathy score De Vriesdirectly measured
var282Sympathy score Korthals Altesdirectly measured
var283Sympathy score Deetmandirectly measured
var284Sympathy score Nijpelsdirectly measured
var285Sympathy score Rudingdirectly measured
var286Sympathy score De Kortedirectly measured
var287Sympathy score Smit-Kroesdirectly measured
var288Egoism versus altruism - most peopledirectly measured
var289Egoism versus altruism - selfratingdirectly measured
var290Weighting factor wave 1directly measured
var291Weighting factor wave 2directly measured
var292Weighting factor CBSdirectly measured
var293Date of second interview (mmdd)directly measured
var294Start of second interview (hhmmss)directly measured
var295End of second interview (hhmmss)directly measured
var296Duration of second interview (hmmss)directly measured
var297Present at interview-children under 6ydirectly measured
var298Present at interview-childrn 6y and overdirectly measured
var299Present at interview-spouse or partnerdirectly measured
var300Present at interview-other relativesdirectly measured
var301Present at interview-other adultsdirectly measured
var302Presence of disturbing influencesdirectly measured
var303Disturbing influences - 1st codingdirectly measured
var304Disturbing influences - 2nd codingdirectly measured
var305Verbatim answer most import problm questdirectly measured
var306Most importnt problm 1st answr-1986 codedirectly measured
var307Most importnt problm 2nd answr-1986 codedirectly measured
var308Most importnt problm 3rd answr-1986 codedirectly measured
var309Most importnt problm 4th answr-1986 codedirectly measured
var310Most importnt problm 5th answr-1986 codedirectly measured

Questions

Questionnaire: Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies 1989

The questionnaire was administered in Dutch.

Browse Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies 1989

Response Information

Response Overview
The 1989 study has been designed as a two wave, short-term panel study, and was carried out on the basis of a representative sample of the Dutch electorate at the time of the parliamentary elections. The first wave of interviews was conducted before the election in the period from July 15 until September 5 (one day before the election). This period coincided with the summer vacation period in the western part of the country, which may have had a negative effect on the response rate. The second wave of interviews started on September 9 (three days after the election) and continued through November 13. By this time all vacations had ended. The fieldwork did not encounter meaningful problems.
Collection Events
Period
15-07-1989 to 05-09-1989
Sample
Original sample 4000, gross sample 3808, response 1754
Collection Mode
face-to-face interviews
Fieldwork Note
Ended one day before the election. Multi-stage sample: first stage - households from PTT register/ second stage - one random elector from each household.

Period
09-09-1989 to 13-11-1989
Sample
wave 2 of panel, response 85.9%
Collection Mode
face-to-face interviews
Fieldwork Note
Started three days after the election.